Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

³ª³ë ÇÏÀ̺긮µå ¼¼¶ó¹Í ¼ÒÀç·Î CAD/CAM Á¦Á¶µÈ ±¸Ä¡ºÎ ´Ü°üÀÇÀý»è°¡°ø¼º 3Â÷¿ø ÁßøºÐ¼® Æò°¡

Three-dimensional evaluation of the machinability of monolithic CAD/CAM-generated posterior crowns by nano-hybrid ceramic

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úÀç·áÇÐȸÁö 2019³â 46±Ç 2È£ p.89 ~ 98
±èÀçÈ«,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÀçÈ« ( Kim Jae-Hong ) - ºÎ»ê°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ º¸°Ç°úÇдëÇÐ Ä¡±â°øÇаú

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â Ä¡°ú ijµåÄ·¿ë ÇÏÀ̺긮µå ¼¼¶ó¹Í ºí·ÏµéÀÇ Àý»è°¡°ø¼ºÀ» ºñ±³ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇöÀç ±¹³», ¿Ü¿¡¼Ò°³µÈ 3Á¾ÀÇ Ä³µåÄ·¿ë ÇÏÀ̺긮µå ¼¼¶ó¹Í ºí·Ï(Vita enamic, Lava Ultimate, GC Cerasmart)À» ½ÇÇ豺À¸·Î ÇÏ°í, 1Á¾ÀDZâÁ¸ ¹æ½ÄÀÇ ¼¼¶ó¹Í ºí·Ï(Vita Mark ¥±)À» ´ëÁ¶±ºÀ¸·Î ÁöÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÁÖ ¸ðÇü°ú Áö´ëÄ¡¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¸ðÇü ½ºÄ³³Ê¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿©µðÁöÅÐ ÀλóÀ» äµæÇÑ ÈÄ, CAD ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¼öº¹¹°À» µðÀÚÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù. µðÁöÅÐÈ­ µÈ µ¥ÀÌÅ͵éÀº3Â÷¿ø Áßø ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î¸¦ ÅëÇØ ¼­·Î Áßø½ÃÅ°´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î °¢ ¼¼¶ó¹Í ´Ü°üÀÇ Àý»è°¡°ø¼ºÀ» Á¤·®ÀûÀ¸·Î »êÃâÇÏ¿´°í, Ä÷¯¸ÊÀ̹ÌÁö¸¦ ÅëÇØ ½Ã°¢ÀûÀÎ Â÷À̸¦ È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù. °¢ ±¸Ä¡ºÎ ¼¼¶ó¹Í ´Ü°üÀÇ ±×·ìµé¿¡¼­ Á¤·®ÀûÀ¸·Î »êÃâµÈ root meansquare (RMS)´Â ÀÏ¿øºÐ»êºÐ¼® ¹æ¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù(¥á= 0.05). ±¸Ä¡ºÎ ´Ü°üÀÇ ³»¸é Àý»è°¡°ø¼ºÀº±×·ì °£ÀÇ ¸ðµÎ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç(p<0.05), ±âÁ¸ ¹æ½ÄÀÇ ¼¼¶ó¹Í ºí·Ï(VM)Àº ÇÏÀ̺긮µå ¼¼¶ó¹Í ½ÇÇ豺¿¡ ºñÇس·Àº Àý»è°¡°ø¼ºÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. °á·ÐÀûÀ¸·Î ½É¹Ì º¸Ã¶¹° Á¦ÀÛÀ» À§ÇØ ¼¼¶ó¹Í ¼ÒÀç »ç¿ë ½Ã ÇÏÀ̺긮µå ¼¼¶ó¹Í ¼ÒÀç´ÂÀý»è°¡°ø¼º Ãø¸é¿¡¼­ ÀÓ»óÀûÀ¸·Î ´õ ÀûÀýÇÏ´Ù°í ÆǴܵȴÙ.

The purpose of this study comparatively analyzed the machinability of various dental hybrid blocks manufactured by usingthe CAD/CAM system. Three hybrid composite blocks (Vita enamic, Lava Ultimate, GC Cerasmart) were used for experimentalgroups and one conventional ceramic block (Vita Mark ¥±) was used for control. The digital impression of the master modeland abutment was taken by using a scanner, and then the CAD software program was used to design restorations. The four-axismilling machine (inLab MCXL; Sirona Dental Systems GmbH, Bensheim, Germany) was used four materials. The digitized datawas superimposed with 3D inspection software to quantitatively obtain the machinability of a ceramic crown, and visual differenceswere confirmed with a color map. The root mean square (RMS) values of ceramic crown group were statistically analyzedwith one-way ANOVA (¥á=0.05). While there was a significant difference in the machinability of the internal surface, amongfour groups, there was statistically significant difference between conventional (VM group) and hybrid ceramic (VE, LU, GCgroups) (p<0.05). Consequently, the machinability of VM is lower than that of other hybrid ceramics, and the machinabilityof VE is better than that of LU and GC. For ceramics as final restorations, manufacturing of dental restorations using hybridcomposite ceramic is recommended.

Å°¿öµå

Ä¡°úijµåÄ· ½Ã½ºÅÛ , ÇÏÀ̺긮µå ¼¼¶ó¹Í , Àý»è°¡°ø¼º , 3Â÷¿ø ºÐ¼®
Dental CAD/CAM system, Hybrid ceramic, Machinability, 3-Dimensional analysis

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI